Arb agent: strategy scorecard

Built 2026-11-03 00:45 UTC · refreshed hourly · P&L from venue fills, funding and account equity (book shown as a cross-check) · USD
Recommendation. Next dollar from main → S2 PRIME bidder ($50, already prepared: RVRS-S2-Bidder-Deposit-v2). S2 is the only strategy whose results are capped by cash right now: PRIME is 61 of 106 auctions and has no bidder, and $50 lifts the per-bid cap from $2.50 to $20. S5 is the best performer but isn't capital-bound ($11 units, $36 free on HL), so it needs no new money. S1's idle ~$50 should stay parked until a pair clears the entry bar, and paper strategies get no capital.
#StrategyStatusCapital $StartTradesWinRealized net $Open $ReturnAnnualisedFees $Fees / grossMax DD $In marketVerdict
1HL funding harvest (+ martingale sub)live402026-10-231346%+1.60+0.08+4.2%+148.3%+0.2011%-1.01100%BEST SO FAR: keep
Venue check: HL fills+funding, non-BTC/ETH/SOL; open GOAT short, NIL long; book by sub: harvest +0.23, martingale +1.46 · Book: +1.70
Capital: main's HL account net deposits $40 (shared with S1's HL legs) · Biggest risk: Unhedged directional on illiquid alts; martingale tail (a runner that never rebounds; ladder cap $88, −30% stop) · Limited by: Funding extremes regime + $11 units / HL margin guard (70%); 13 trades = small sample, 3 trades make the profit
Why: Only live strategy positive on venue data. Small sample and concentrated (ALT martingale ≈ +$1.30 of it). Not capital-bound: units are $11, so more money doesn't help yet.
2Derive liquidation bidderlive122026-10-191–-2.98+4.25+10.6%+270.5%+0.021%––PROMISING: fund PRIME
Venue check: subs value $13.27 vs $12.00 net in; cash $9.02; held: SOL-20261106-95-P 1.05591 ($4.25) · Book: +2.27 (book +$2.27 on the perp exit is vs a discounted cost basis; Derive marks the same sale −$0.80)
Capital: bidder subs 118010/118011 net cash in · Biggest risk: Inventory: won slices are held long (owner rule); the SOL 95-P is worth $0 if SOL ≥ 95 at the 11-06 expiry · Limited by: Cash ($5 in MIDCAP sub; PRIME, 58% of auctions, uncovered) and auction flow (~0.4/h, many tiny)
Why: One auction won at a 10% discount; the +MTM is mostly an open put that may expire at $0. Structurally bound by cash and auction coverage, so the marginal dollar matters most here.
3Funding carry (delta-neutral, 3 venues)live522026-10-19617%-0.430.00-0.8%-20.7%+0.26156%-0.4533%IDLE: park
Venue check: HL BTC/ETH/SOL legs +1.59 · dYdX -0.31 · Derive 118003 -1.71 · Book: -0.43
Capital: dYdX $34.5 + Derive 118003 net in; HL legs share main's HL account · Biggest risk: Legging/execution across venues (10-27 SOL incident −$0.24); exit basis slippage ≈ the whole carry · Limited by: Funding regime: no pair has cleared the 0.004%/h entry bar since it was raised 10-30; ~0.3% round-trip cost at $46/leg
Why: −$0.43 over 6 trades; costs ≈ the carry at this size and the regime is flat. Its $50 on dYdX/Derive sits unused.
4HIP-3 cross-dex carrypaper222026-10-2810%-0.15-0.16-1.4%-95.6%+0.0664%-0.1549%PAPER: costs too high
Venue check: paper, $11/leg at impact prices; open UNITREE
Capital: paper $11/leg · Biggest risk: Deployer oracles; impact crossing ≈0.47% per entry · Limited by: Entry costs exceed the carry for short-lived spreads; live needs riskd builder-dex support
Why: Paper loses: crossing costs eat the carry.
5VWAP accumulate → exitpaper1002026-10-31450%-0.460.00-0.5%-55.2%––-0.6966%PAPER: likely kill 11-21
Venue check: paper $50/config; costs included in bp
Capital: paper $50 per config · Biggest risk: No edge out of sample: P&L ≈ beta − costs (backtest: 0 of 48 configs held up) · Limited by: Decision after 2026-11-21
Why: Paper confirms the backtest: no edge after costs.
6Derive options structural-arb monitormonitor–2026-07-140––––––––0%MONITOR: not tradeable at our size
Venue check: paper TRUE_ARB: 59 settled, $741 at displayed size (not our size); 2 in the last 30 d; last 2026-10-29
Capital: none · Biggest risk: n/a (no orders) · Limited by: Derive $0.50/leg base fee: a crossing needs > $1 credit at displayed size, which is never shown
Why: Real mispricings exist on paper but at sizes and fees we can't hit.
7Cross-venue dislocation monitorpaper (monitor)–2026-10-190––––––––0%MONITOR: no signals
Venue check: 11,538 scans, 2 cleared gap ≥0.3% and net ≥0.1%; no paper entries
Capital: none · Biggest risk: Two-venue execution on a fleeting gap · Limited by: Opportunity: gaps after fees almost never reach the entry bar
Why: Gaps after fees almost never reach the bar.
–Momentum doubleroff (proposal)––0––––––––0%OFF
Venue check: plan only (strategies/MOMENTUM_DOUBLER.md), never armed
Capital: none · Biggest risk: Doubling ladder = small chance of a big win; no proven edge · Limited by: Not approved
Why: Proposal only.
Return = (realized + open) / capital since start; annualised linearly (meaningless under ~2 weeks, shown for comparison only). Fees / gross = fees ÷ |P&L before fees|. Max DD = peak-to-trough of cumulative realized P&L by trade close. In market = share of time since start with a position open. S2 realized treats held inventory as $0 (worst case); its MTM value is under Open. Paper rows are simulations. Excluded: regimefx (FX desk) and fadepool (separate projects).